The One That Got Away: Why Margins Matter in Engineering Recruitment

The One That Got Away: Why Margins Matter in Engineering Recruitment

I wasn’t planning on watching much of the Winter Olympics.

Like many people, I caught a few highlights and then somehow found myself completely drawn in. What struck me most wasn’t just the athleticism or the spectacle.

It was the margins.

In the Women’s Downhill Skiing, the difference between winning gold and finishing fourth was just 0.86 seconds.

Less than a second.

Years of training. Countless early mornings. Relentless preparation. All decided by a margin most of us wouldn’t even notice on a stopwatch.

It made me think about recruitment.

Because in our world, timing often makes the difference between securing the engineer you really need and watching “the one that got away” join a competitor instead.

The Engineering Recruitment Reality

In engineering recruitment, strong candidates don’t remain available for long.

When a skilled ex-military engineer decides the time is right to move, they are rarely speaking to just one employer. They are exploring options, assessing culture, evaluating progression, and considering where their skills will be valued most.

The difference between securing them and missing out is rarely dramatic.

It’s not usually about a wildly different salary.
It’s not always about a radically better benefits package.

More often than not, it’s about pace.

  • How quickly feedback is provided after interview

  • How decisively an offer is made

  • How clearly expectations are communicated

  • How engaged the employer remains between offer and start date

Just like the downhill skier, it’s the margins that matter.

When Momentum Is Lost

We’ve seen it happen more than once.

An employer takes a little longer to confirm next steps. Internal approvals stall. Feedback drifts. Another company moves with clarity and urgency.

Suddenly, the candidate is no longer available.

On paper, both roles were strong.
Both offered competitive packages.
Both had good long-term prospects.

The difference? Momentum.

Recruitment isn’t a race down a mountain, and decisions absolutely need to be considered. But in a competitive engineering market, particularly when working with experienced ex-military talent, controlled urgency matters.

Good candidates interpret slow processes as hesitation.
Decisive processes signal confidence.

2026 and the Opportunity Ahead

As more personnel transition from the Armed Forces, employers will have access to an exceptional talent pool of engineers, technicians, and technical managers.

But that talent pool will be competitive.

The organisations that succeed won’t necessarily be the ones offering the very highest salaries.

They’ll be the ones who:

  • Move efficiently

  • Communicate clearly

  • Demonstrate commitment

  • Maintain engagement throughout the process

A Simple Question for Hiring Managers

If you’re hiring this year, ask yourself:

Are we moving at the right pace?

And in recruitment, just like in elite sport, the smallest margins can make all the difference.

Adrian Cheesman